This book, written by John
Doerr, is a management Bible that talks about nothing but common sense.
Simplicity, when communicated effectively, is infectious! The fundamental
premise of this book lies in the fact that Ideas are easy, Execution is
everything. John Doerr having worked at Intel imbibed this philosophy from Andy
Grove (Intel) & then went on to become early investor in Google. He then
helped successfully implement OKRs in multiple organisations ranging from
Google to Zume Pizza to Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to Adobe and many
more! Below is my interpretation of the book –
OKR (Objective & Key
Result) – a collaborative goal setting protocol for companies, teams and
individuals.
They cannot substitute for sound judgement, strong leadership, or a creative
workplace culture. But if those fundamentals are in place, OKRs can guide you
to mountaintop
- Definition
- Objective – simply WHAT is to be
achieved, no more and no less
- Key
Results –
benchmark and monitor HOW we get to the objective. Effective KRs are
specific and time bound, aggressive yet realistic. Most of all, they are
measurable and verifiable
- Eg: Intel in 1971 - O: “we
want to dominate the mid range microcomputer business”. KR: “win 10 new
designs for 8085” (easily measurable)
- On assembly line it is easy enough to distinguish output from activity. It gets trickier when employees are
paid to think
- It was liberating too (pasting your OKRs on your desk). When people came to me mid
quarter with requests to draft new data sheets, I felt I could say no without fear of repercussion
- OKR superpowers (that it brings to the table)
- Focus
- Alignment
- Tracking
- Stretching
- Andy Grove said, “if
the vectors point in different directions, they all add up to zero. But
if you get everybody pointing in the same direction, you maximise the
results”
- I can’t
tell you how many times I’ve seen people walk out of meetings saying, “
I’m going to conquer the world”... and 3 months later, nothing has
happened. You get people whipped up with enthusiasm, but they don’t know
what to do with it
- Jeff Weiner: “When
you’re tired of saying it, people are starting to hear it”. It just can’t stop with unveiling top
line OKRs at a quarterly all hands meeting
- The more
over ambitious the OKR, the greater the risk of overlooking a vital
criterion.
To safeguard quality while pushing for quantitative deliverables, one
solution is to pair key results – Measure
both Effects and Counter-effects
- You need
to build your goal muscle gradually, incrementally. Doing too much too
soon will definitely end in pain
- The more
challenging an objective, the more tempting it may be to abandon it.
Commit!
- At any
given time, some significant % of people are working on the wrong things.
The challenge is knowing which ones. Research shows public goals are more likely to be
attained than privately held ones. Transparency
seeds collaboration
- Ill
effects of a pure Top Down approach: When all objectives are cascaded, process degraded
into a mechanical exercise with 4 adverse effects –
- loss of agility
- lack of flexibility
- marginalised
contributors
- one dimensional
linkages
- Even a 100% Bottoms up approach isn’t ideal. A healthy
OKR environment strikes a balance
between alignment and autonomy, common purpose and creative latitude.
Mix of bottom up and top down remains half and half
- OKRs are
not islands. To the contrary, they create networks - vertical, horizontal,
diagonal - to connect an organisation’s most vital network
- One
underrated virtue of OKRs is that they can be tracked, revised or adapted
as circumstances dictate unlike traditional frozen “set them and forget
them” business goals.
OKRs are living, breathing organisms with phases –
- the setup
- OKR Shepherd(someone to
drive universal adoption)
- midlife tracking
(single greatest motivator is making progress in one’s work)
- wrap up: rinse and
repeat (score, assessment and reflection)
- A mission
is directional. An objective has a set of concrete steps that you’re
engaged in and actually trying to go for. Don’t confuse the two
- Without
frequent status updates, goals slide into irrelevance; the gap between plan and
reality widens by the day
- We do not
learn from experience, we learn from reflecting on experience
- If companies don’t continue to innovate (not iterate),
they’ll die (Stretch OKRs are a must)
- Stretch
goals cannot seem like a long march to nowhere. Stretch your team too
fast and too far, and it may snap. Leaders
must convey two things - importance of the outcome and the belief that
it’s attainable
- The annual
appraisal cycle is mostly futile due to recency bias, bell curve and
rankings.
Quarterly review of OKRs makes this redundant. New process of continuous
performance management is achieved by - C (conversations), F (feedback) and R (recognition)
- The key
part to implementing OKRs and CFRs is decoupling compensation (both raise
and bonus) from OKRs.
This system has 3 key requirements –
- executive support
- clarity on company
objectives and how they align with individual priorities (OKRs)
- investment in training
to equip managers and leaders to be more effective
- Culture,
as the saying goes, eats strategy for breakfast. Companies that out behave
their competition will also outperform them
No comments:
Post a Comment